![]() Relevant callstack (open expander)Ģ.80 s 26.5%Đ s SPCanvas::handle_draw(_GtkWidget*, _cairo*)Ģ.80 s 26.5%Đ s _cairo_default_context_paintĢ.80 s 26.5%Đ s _cairo_quartz_surface_paintĢ.79 s 26.5%Đ s _cairo_quartz_draw_sourceĢ.79 s 26.5%Đ s CGContextDrawImageWithOptionsĢ.79 s 26.5%Đ s CGContextDelegateDrawImageĢ.79 s 26.5%Đ s backing_store_DrawImage.llvm.776B8D61Ģ.79 s 26.5%Đ s _backing_store_DrawImage_block_invokeĢ.55 s 24.1%Đ s ripc_AcquireRIPImageDataĢ.55 s 24.1%Đ s RIPImageCacheGetRetainedĢ.52 s 23.8%Đ s RIPImageDataInitializeShared Not sure if this is a Mac or an Inkscape issue.Īnd also, taken from #288 (closed), under Inkscape 1.0alpha2 instruments suggests that image conversion is taking most of the time. I never had this issue with the old 32 bit + xQuartz system, it was smooth and didnt slow down at all.Informally this is as bad as a 2-3 fps frame rate. In latest builds, hiding toolbars/rulers/status bars doesn't help.Menus are still normal, so issue with the canvas rendering.Performance is worse as you scroll (25% zoom is still responsive, 200% has 1-2 second delay before screen loads).Substantial pause before rest of screen loads.import image or draw a simple rectangle.if the coders are proud of the work they created where is my place to complain about it however if they are looking for honest comments I won’t lie and say it’s great it’s perfect it’s the best invention since slice bread because it ain’t it really feels like a rollback. I’d prefer everyone to stay safe in this crisis and to each their own opinions. Not here to cause a fight hell I use the old version of inkscape to make coloring books that are donated to keep the kids occupied in this crisis but the new version is just not workable.Īs for childish comments I won’t answer to that I’ve worked on almost every type of machine code and I still have the original floppies of Windows 3.1 and the best joke was 3.11 with the calculator bug that you subtracted both version and you would end up with negative 0.Īnd in all honesty compare the versions 1.0 and the i0.92.x series and tell me it’s a improvement in design… unfortunately it ain’t …Īnyways I won’t start a war on Ghacks on this topic. Hell I support open source what I don’t support is the exactly like Microsoft is doing and that’s being a beta tester on software that is not in beta mode. Maybe the original code was flawed and prevented new advancements who knows but the UI is disappointing and the modules that we’re less crammed such as the trace look like a compressed flop. You’ve described it better than I could… Compared to the previous version in which extensions we’re in excellent progress this feels like a restart of code. ![]() Inkscape is FREE anyway and Open source, Isnt it what lemming love open source so much? because you can just grab the code and modify it? then if you dont like the UI so much, why don’t you go ahead and grab the source code? modify it and make the UI “better” and more “modern” looking and then you can stop complaining. the UI is fine I mean, it is fine for the vector software, what do you want? 3 buttons and then some advanced mode where you only use hotkeys to do everything? you are complaining about the UI and I expect to believe you are “advanced users” who only work with hotkeys? You probably never even used windows 3.1 to even talk about it, you are just repeating what others say because you don’t have a brain of your own to think about another original thing.Īnd it is funny how people talk about the UI and don’t even talk about the features, even if the UI was soooooooo bad, does it stop the program from being decent vector software? no. but no, it doesn’t look like windows 3.1 and windows 10 doesn’t look like windows 3.1 either. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |